Grad–Shafranov equation

The Grad–Shafranov equation (H. Grad and H. Rubin (1958); Vitalii Dmitrievich Shafranov (1966)) is the equilibrium equation in ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) for a two dimensional plasma, for example the axisymmetric toroidal plasma in a tokamak. This equation takes the same form as the Hicks equation from fluid dynamics.^[1] This equation is a two-dimensional, nonlinear, elliptic partial differential equation obtained from the reduction of the ideal MHD equations to two dimensions, often for the case of toroidal axisymmetry (the case relevant in a tokamak). Taking ${\displaystyle (r,\theta ,z)}$ as the cylindrical coordinates, the flux function ${\displaystyle \psi }$ is governed by the equation,

${\displaystyle {\frac {\partial ^{2}\psi }{\partial r^{2}}}-{\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \psi }{\partial r}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}\psi }{\partial z^{2}}}=-\mu _{0}r^{2}{\frac {dp}{d\psi }}-{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {dF^{2}}{d\psi }},}$

where ${\displaystyle \mu _{0}}$ is the magnetic permeability, ${\displaystyle p(\psi )}$ is the pressure, ${\displaystyle F(\psi )=rB_{\theta }}$ and the magnetic field and current are, respectively, given by$${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\mathbf {B} &={\frac {1}{r}}\nabla \psi \times {\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{\theta }+{\frac {F}{r}}{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{\theta },\\\mu _{0}\mathbf {J} &={\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {dF}{d\psi }}\nabla \psi \times {\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{\theta }-\left[{\frac {\partial }{\partial r}}\left({\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \psi }{\partial r}}\right)+{\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\psi }{\partial z^{2}}}\right]{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{\theta }.\end{aligned}}}$$

The nature of the equilibrium, whether it be a tokamak, reversed field pinch, etc. is largely determined by the choices of the two functions ${\displaystyle F(\psi )}$ and ${\displaystyle p(\psi )}$ as well as the boundary conditions.

In the following, it is assumed that the system is 2-dimensional with ${\displaystyle z}$ as the invariant axis, i.e. ${\textstyle {\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}}$ produces 0 for any quantity. Then the magnetic field can be written in cartesian coordinates as $${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} =\left({\frac {\partial A}{\partial y}},-{\frac {\partial A}{\partial x}},B_{z}(x,y)\right),}$$ or more compactly, $${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} =\nabla A\times {\hat {\mathbf {z} }}+B_{z}{\hat {\mathbf {z} }},}$$ where ${\displaystyle A(x,y){\hat {\mathbf {z} }}}$ is the vector potential for the in-plane (x and y components) magnetic field. Note that based on this form for B we can see that A is constant along any given magnetic field line, since ${\displaystyle \nabla A}$ is everywhere perpendicular to B. (Also note that -A is the flux function ${\displaystyle \psi }$ mentioned above.)

Two dimensional, stationary, magnetic structures are described by the balance of pressure forces and magnetic forces, i.e.: $${\displaystyle \nabla p=\mathbf {j} \times \mathbf {B} ,}$$ where p is the plasma pressure and j is the electric current. It is known that p is a constant along any field line, (again since ${\displaystyle \nabla p}$ is everywhere perpendicular to B). Additionally, the two-dimensional assumption (${\textstyle {\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}=0}$) means that the z- component of the left hand side must be zero, so the z-component of the magnetic force on the right hand side must also be zero. This means that ${\displaystyle \mathbf {j} _{\perp }\times \mathbf {B} _{\perp }=0}$, i.e. ${\displaystyle \mathbf {j} _{\perp }}$ is parallel to ${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} _{\perp }}$.

The right hand side of the previous equation can be considered in two parts: $${\displaystyle \mathbf {j} \times \mathbf {B} =j_{z}({\hat {\mathbf {z} }}\times \mathbf {B_{\perp }} )+\mathbf {j_{\perp }} \times {\hat {\mathbf {z} }}B_{z},}$$ where the ${\displaystyle \perp }$ subscript denotes the component in the plane perpendicular to the ${\displaystyle z}$-axis. The ${\displaystyle z}$ component of the current in the above equation can be written in terms of the one-dimensional vector potential as $${\displaystyle j_{z}=-{\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}\nabla ^{2}A.}$$

The in plane field is $${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} _{\perp }=\nabla A\times {\hat {\mathbf {z} }},}$$ and using Maxwell–Ampère's equation, the in plane current is given by $${\displaystyle \mathbf {j} _{\perp }={\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}\nabla B_{z}\times {\hat {\mathbf {z} }}.}$$

In order for this vector to be parallel to ${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} _{\perp }}$ as required, the vector ${\displaystyle \nabla B_{z}}$ must be perpendicular to ${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} _{\perp }}$, and ${\displaystyle B_{z}}$ must therefore, like ${\displaystyle p}$, be a field-line invariant.

Rearranging the cross products above leads to $${\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {z} }}\times \mathbf {B} _{\perp }=\nabla A-(\mathbf {\hat {z}} \cdot \nabla A)\mathbf {\hat {z}} =\nabla A,}$$ and $${\displaystyle \mathbf {j} _{\perp }\times B_{z}\mathbf {\hat {z}} ={\frac {B_{z}}{\mu _{0}}}(\mathbf {\hat {z}} \cdot \nabla B_{z})\mathbf {\hat {z}} -{\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}B_{z}\nabla B_{z}=-{\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}B_{z}\nabla B_{z}.}$$

These results can be substituted into the expression for ${\displaystyle \nabla p}$ to yield: $${\displaystyle \nabla p=-\left[{\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}\nabla ^{2}A\right]\nabla A-{\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}B_{z}\nabla B_{z}.}$$

Since ${\displaystyle p}$ and ${\displaystyle B_{z}}$ are constants along a field line, and functions only of ${\displaystyle A}$, hence ${\displaystyle \nabla p={\frac {dp}{dA}}\nabla A}$ and ${\displaystyle \nabla B_{z}={\frac {dB_{z}}{dA}}\nabla A}$. Thus, factoring out ${\displaystyle \nabla A}$ and rearranging terms yields the Grad–Shafranov equation: $${\displaystyle \nabla ^{2}A=-\mu _{0}{\frac {d}{dA}}\left(p+{\frac {B_{z}^{2}}{2\mu _{0}}}\right).}$$

This derivation is only used for Tokamaks, but it can be enlightening. Using the definition of 'The Theory of Toroidally Confined Plasmas 1:3'(Roscoe White), Writing ${\displaystyle {\vec {B}}}$ by contravariant basis ${\displaystyle (\nabla \Psi ,\nabla \phi ,\nabla \zeta )}$: $${\displaystyle {\vec {B}}=\nabla \Psi \times \nabla \phi +{\bar {F}}\nabla \phi ,}$$

we have ${\displaystyle {\vec {j}}}$: $${\displaystyle \mu _{0}{\vec {j}}=\nabla \times {\vec {B}}=-\Delta ^{*}\Psi \nabla \phi +\nabla {\bar {F}}\times \nabla \phi \quad {\text{, where}}\ \Delta ^{*}=r\partial _{r}(r^{-1}\partial _{r})+\partial _{\phi }^{2}{\text{;}}}$$

then force balance equation: $${\displaystyle \mu _{0}{\vec {j}}\times {\vec {B}}=\mu _{0}\nabla p{\text{.}}}$$

Working out, we have: $${\displaystyle -\Delta ^{*}\Psi ={\bar {F}}{\frac {d{\bar {F}}}{d\Psi }}+\mu _{0}R^{2}{\frac {dp}{d\Psi }}{\text{.}}}$$

• Grad, H., and Rubin, H. (1958) Hydromagnetic Equilibria and Force-Free Fields Archived 2023-06-21 at the Wayback Machine. Proceedings of the 2nd UN Conf. on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Vol. 31, Geneva: IAEA p. 190.
• Shafranov, V.D. (1966) Plasma equilibrium in a magnetic field, Reviews of Plasma Physics, Vol. 2, New York: Consultants Bureau, p. 103.
• Woods, Leslie C. (2004) Physics of plasmas, Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, chapter 2.5.4
• Haverkort, J.W. (2009) Axisymmetric Ideal MHD Tokamak Equilibria. Notes about the Grad–Shafranov equation, selected aspects of the equation and its analytical solutions.
• Haverkort, J.W. (2009) Axisymmetric Ideal MHD equilibria with Toroidal Flow. Incorporation of toroidal flow, relation to kinetic and two-fluid models, and discussion of specific analytical solutions.