Jump to content

Krull–Akizuki theorem

In commutative algebra, the Krull–Akizuki theorem states the following: Let A be a one-dimensional reduced noetherian ring,[1] K its total ring of fractions. Suppose L is a finite extension of K.[2] If and B is reduced, then B is a noetherian ring of dimension at most one. Furthermore, for every nonzero ideal of B, is finite over A.[3][4]

Note that the theorem does not say that B is finite over A. The theorem does not extend to higher dimension. One important consequence of the theorem is that the integral closure of a Dedekind domain A in a finite extension of the field of fractions of A is again a Dedekind domain. This consequence does generalize to a higher dimension: the Mori–Nagata theorem states that the integral closure of a noetherian domain is a Krull domain.

Proof

First observe that and KB is a finite extension of K, so we may assume without loss of generality that . Then for some . Since each is integral over K, there exists such that is integral over A. Let . Then C is a one-dimensional noetherian ring, and , where denotes the total ring of fractions of C. Thus we can substitute C for A and reduce to the case .

Let be minimal prime ideals of A; there are finitely many of them. Let be the field of fractions of and the kernel of the natural map . Then we have:

and .

Now, if the theorem holds when A is a domain, then this implies that B is a one-dimensional noetherian domain since each is and since . Hence, we reduced the proof to the case A is a domain. Let be an ideal and let a be a nonzero element in the nonzero ideal . Set . Since is a zero-dim noetherian ring; thus, artinian, there is an such that for all . We claim

Since it suffices to establish the inclusion locally, we may assume A is a local ring with the maximal ideal . Let x be a nonzero element in B. Then, since A is noetherian, there is an n such that and so . Thus,

Now, assume n is a minimum integer such that and the last inclusion holds. If , then we easily see that . But then the above inclusion holds for , contradiction. Hence, we have and this establishes the claim. It now follows:

Hence, has finite length as A-module. In particular, the image of there is finitely generated and so is finitely generated. The above shows that has dimension at most zero and so B has dimension at most one. Finally, the exact sequence of A-modules shows that is finite over A.

References

  1. ^ In this article, a ring is commutative and has unity.
  2. ^ If are rings, we say that B is a finite extension of A if B is a finitely generated A module.
  3. ^ Bourbaki 1989, Ch VII, §2, no. 5, Proposition 5
  4. ^ Swanson, Irena; Huneke, Craig (2006). Integral Closure of Ideals, Rings, and Modules. Cambridge University Press. pp. 87–88.

See what we do next...

OR

By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.

Success: You're subscribed now !