R v Viljoen

R v Viljoen^[1] is an important case in South African law. It was heard in the Appellate Division on 23 April 1941, with judgment handed down on 6 May. De Wet CJ, Watermeyer JA, Tindall JA, Centlivres JA, and Feetham JA presided.

A statement had been made by the accused to a peace officer without compliance with the formalities prescribed by section 273(1) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act.^[2]

That statement, the court found, although it was capable of implying an admission of guilt, was also capable of a rational explanation, which did not include any such admission. The court held, therefore, that the statement was not a confession within the meaning of the section.

• Confession (law)
• Crime in South Africa
• Evidence (law)
• Law of South Africa
• South African criminal law
• South African criminal procedure

• R v Viljoen 1941 AD 366.

• Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 31 of 1917.

This article relating to case law in South Africa is a stub. You can help Wik.ipedia.Pro by expanding it.

• v
• t