Talk:Bayh–Dole Act

This article is rated C-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Invention Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Government Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance). U.S. Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) thing(s). Science Policy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

2012 2013 2016 2019

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

What does "dealing with" mean? I think it would more meaningful to say:

"legislation permitting contractors to own inventions arising from federal government-funded research"

For the 2nd paragraph, I'll insert my questions/comments in square brackets:

A key change made by Bayh–Dole was in the procedures by which federal contractors that acquired ownership of inventions [they didn't "acquire" the invention if they invented it] made with federal funding could retain that ownership ["retain" in the sense of continued ownership, not in the sense of taking ownership. Ie. not like a client retaining a lawyer. A better word might be "keep"]. Before the Bayh–Dole Act, the Federal Procurement Regulation required the use of a patent rights clause that in some cases required federal contractors or their inventors to assign inventions made under contract to the federal government unless the funding agency determined that the public interest was better served by allowing the contractor or inventor to retain principal or exclusive rights.[4] The National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, and the Department of Commerce had implemented programs that permitted non-profit organizations to retain rights to inventions upon notice without requesting an agency determination.[5] By contrast, Bayh–Dole uniformly permits non-profit organizations and small business firm contractors to retain ownership of inventions made under contract and which they have acquired ["acquired" what? The invention? The contract? They didn't acquire the invention if they initially created it], provided that each invention is timely disclosed and the contractor elects to retain ownership in that invention