Talk:Čedomir Jovanović

This article is rated C-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wik.ipedia.Pro's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Serbia: Belgrade Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Belgrade task force (marked as Mid-importance).

This article seems to be quite biased and incorporates a substantial amount of unsubstantiated information. Additionally, a number of the source links at the bottom are either dead or point to irrelevant or deliberately misleading links. ----------- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.208.255.86 (talk) 20:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that section of this article about Cedomir Jovanovic and Mafia is misleading and should be updated to conform with NPO guidelines. His statement has been put out of context and government as a whole was accused for cooperating with organized crime. I think that that paragraph should be deleted or changed to reflect both sides. At present it alleges only one side of the story.

I did not write that he WAS mafia, I wrote that he was meeting them, presumably on behalf of the government. Which he did said he was. What's the problem there? Please, read the paragraph again, it does say that he was accused of actually being involved with them, but it does not that he was. I will reword it anyway, but seriously, read that paragraph again, before you make any more POV accusations. --Dejan Cabrilo 16:00, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I am sorry to reply again, but I modified the paragraph, to make sure that presumably who had contacts with mafia in order to curb them. What was exactly POV about that paragraph? He did have contacts ("my hands are dirty, but my consciousness is clear"), and he said so. Was he giving them any favors or just making sure that mafia stays out of politics or whatnot - we really don't know (I am sure it's the other thing, but we cannot prove it). So the article simply says that he was accused of giving them favors, and it says that Jovanovic denied this. If you wish, add stuff about him passing the lie-detector (I just don't know much about it, so I didn't mention it), but don't just remove it. Now please, READ the paragraph before you delete it again! --Dejan Cabrilo 16:12, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I did not delete it. My username is Trigor while it was deleted by mr. Pokrajac who I belive only agrees with me to some point. I do believe it should be changed and I am pleased with correction. I have read it several times and I do believe that there should be more info added. There was assembly hearing of Jovanocih. I will search for more statements to put them online and that will in turn ,I believe, present more objective picture. I personally do not believe in forced deletion of article. I prefer POV sign. It left me to believe after first reading that he was dealing with mafia and that he was gangster himself. I sincerely believe that article was POV assumption. You have now mention what he said were reasons behind visit and I believe article in present form to be more accurate than previous version. TRIGOR

Why that part about that being outrageous move? It is a bit POV. Thanks for deleting it.

Until I don't see some evidence I will keep reverting it. So if you want it to stay find some evidence that he is a gipsy.--Trigor 05:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't care less. --estavisti 11:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. It is not problem with that, but with out any facts I don't think it is vise to put it. If you don't have any sources it is bad idea to put this. I will request protection.--Trigor 04:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really couldn't care less about that fucker Cheda. What's annoying me is your Romaphobia. However, if you don't want it in the article, I don't have the time to argue for it. --estavisti 05:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He never admitted using cocaine. 77.105.53.90 (talk) 01:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Marko[reply]

It's interesing to see how Serb radical editors are defacing the article about Cedomir Jovanovic all the time. The same thing is happening with the Natasha Kandic article, too. And Sonja Biserko, weel, she's not just defamed because she still haven't an article about her in Wik.ipedia.Pro.

It seems like everyone in Serbia or in former Yugoslavia that is against the expansion of Serbian borders beyond the territories currently fully controlled by Belgrade (Central Serbia and Vojvodina) are labeled as "bandits", "criminals", "traitors", "non-Serbs" or "anti-Serbs"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.206.226.144 (talk) 15:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is garbage. SovietCanuck (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid personal attacks to other editors (etc. Serb radical). This type of conduct is not permissible in any respect. Every editor with established facts can edit Wik.ipedia.Pro's article.Polemos (talk) 15:15, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did I miss something here? Where's the personal attack you speak of? A Serb radical is someone who supports the Serbian Radical Party. How can that be a personal attack if that's what they call themselves? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.176.189.49 (talk) 12:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a minute. Are those his kids' names for real? I mean, it's just plain stupid to call your kids like that. I mean... i don't know what to say. --Baks (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it's just a joke. As there is no valid source I am going to delete it.--80.136.100.80 (talk) 13:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cedomir Jovanovic is a bittered opportunist, he tries to cash in by riding the serbo- and russophobia wave. He talks tough against Serbian nationalists and warcriminals, but at the same time supports Bosniak and Albanian nationalists and warcriminals. Apparently he is confused about his own identity, does not fit into the Serbian society and as such makes a career on his issues with the support of NATO countries. He is a regular visitor at the US embassy in Belgrade, for example to complain about Russian economic ties to Serbia. He does not care about Serbia, he is a puppet like those during the German occupation. He is dispised by mainstream Serbian public, the people who vote for him have the same issues as he has; i.e. not knowing where he/she fits in, hating the society he/she is living in, but loving everything foreign... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.182.134.143 (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. Please read WP:NOTFORUM before posting messages in talk pages again. Timbouctou (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Ceda Jovanovic Crop.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]