Talk:.41 rimfire

This article is rated Stub-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firearms Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

This is a duplicate of .41 Short and should be merged and/or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ackyraw (talk • contribs) 00:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page describes the .41 rimfire cartridge family, therefore should be in sentence case. StraightAsADie (talk) 05:28, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the attempted deletion of this article… (and no, I'm not the person who requested the merge). There is really very little to be said about the .41 Short, .41 Long and .41 Extra Long cartridges (and almost nothing to be said about the latter). Historically speaking, this cartridge family is not as important as the .22 Long (the first rimfire cartridge) or the .46 Short (the first large caliber metallic cartridge). One article is undoubtedly enough to cover this family, it's just a matter of whether the content of the .41 Short article is merged into the .41 rimfire page or vice versa. Personally I would prefer that the more generic ".41 rimfire" became the primary page, matching the precedent set with .38 rimfire and .46 rimfire. StraightAsADie (talk) 10:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]