Talk:1929 Luft Hansa Junkers G 24 crash

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from 1929 Luft Hansa Junkers G 24 crash appeared on Wik.ipedia.Pro's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that racing driver Glen Kidston was the only survivor of the crash of a Luft Hansa Junkers G 31 in 1929? A record of the entry may be seen at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Recent additions/2011/February.

This article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Accidents Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the Aviation accident project. Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Surrey Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have carried out a review of this article, with very few alterations needed. A well deserved B-class, but I feel that A-class will not be achievable with the subject matter.--Petebutt (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Petebutt: - thank you for that. It is likely that the article can be expanded from local newspapers, but these are not online, making such research harder. Mjroots (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]