Talk:1965 Dutch cabinet formation

This article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Netherlands This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Further sources required to really round out the article and give context, but current ones enough to display notability. Heel succes en dank je wel.

— ♠ Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 20:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't deny it's mostly one source ;) What is a bit difficult though, is that this is the most recent source that is based on all previous sources + new material. So if something is not in that source, of even refuted by the newest source, it's most likely not worth including in the article. Dajasj (talk) 20:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]