Talk:1996 Docklands bombing

This article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance). Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Explosives Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the . Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: British / European / Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force Post-Cold War task force United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Irish republicanism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish republicanism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish republicanism and Irish nationalism related topics on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish republicanismWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Irish republicanismTemplate:WikiProject Irish republicanismIrish republicanism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances) Neutrality: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wik.ipedia.Pro, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

A fact from this article was featured on Wik.ipedia.Pro's Main Page in the On this day section on February 9, 2017 and February 9, 2021.

Does anyone else think it should be at 1996 Docklands bombing? "South Quay bombing" is used but quite rarely, certainly not as much as Docklands bombing. Obviously the alternate name would stay in the llead. Thoughts? One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 23:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it might well be the most accurate title but I've never heard it referred to as the "South Quay bombing". GiollaUidir 22:37, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:SouthKey bombing - 9.2.96.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wik.ipedia.Pro:Media copyright questions. --05:03, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wik.ipedia.Pro states that the bombing occurred on February 9, but BBC says February 10. Which is correct??? 79.78.53.60 (talk) 20:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The BBC news report is referring to the bombing of the previous day, 9 February. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 13:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the article in question, is an "On This Day" e.g. when it happened, and they specifically find the first article they published about the event, then they do an "in context" section. The article says last night because thats the first one published by BBC. Further evidence exists when you click the "BBC News Player" it states in the side box: The IRA admits planting the bomb that exploded in the Docklands area of London last night. (First broadcast 11 February 1996)

see here: BBC News Player

Some sources say 9 and some say 10... Patyo1994 (talk) 21:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, nevermind, the BBC seemed to haved changed their minds: other BBC article Patyo1994 (talk) 22:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/recent/troubles/agreement/breakdown.shtml
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-05-25 06:19:46, 404 Not Found
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-06-08 03:47:06, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SkN1DD1bg0
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-05-25 06:19:46, 404 Not Found
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-06-08 03:47:18, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXgQwftrCHI
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-05-25 06:19:46, 404 Not Found
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-06-08 03:47:30, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4158/is_/ai_n12776587
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-05-25 06:19:49, 404 This requested article does not exist.
  • In 1996 Docklands bombing on 2011-06-08 03:47:48, 404 This requested article does not exist.

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could some kind soul explain to the uninitiated why there is no label of terrorist applied to those responsible for this attack, where as in the 9/11 attack article that label is applied? Is it because only the USA's enemies may be so labelled? I cannot see what justification there can be that the IRA cannot be labled a terrorist organisation when Al Qaeda can be, surely they are both non-governmental organisations who pursue their political agendas through violence against civilians and civilian infrastructure. Is this an inherrent weakness of Wik.ipedia.Pro? Surely all such organisations should either be labelled as terrorists or not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.247.68 (talk) 12:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there has been no response to the above comment in over a year, I intent to edit the article to reflect it as a terrorist act. Anyone who disagrees please speak now and explain your reasoning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.76.231.247 (talk) 04:46, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]