Talk:2022 Fiesta Bowl (December)

2022 Fiesta Bowl (December) is currently a Football good article nominee. Nominated by PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) at 02:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: Postseason college football bowl game

This article is rated C-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

College football Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from 2024 Rose Bowl was copied or moved into 2022 Fiesta Bowl (December). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This review is transcluded from Talk:2022 Fiesta Bowl (December)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 02:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 20:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

I think the game summary is too heavy and excessive and could probably come down in size quite a bit. Only minor changes are needed elsewhere. Ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

• After a TCU punt, Michigan suffered a turnover on downs and the game concluded with TCU receiving the national championship bid. Comma after "downs" WP:CINS

• The Horned Frogs entered the CFP after facing the longest odds of any team to ever do so at 200–1, and entered this game as underdogs by 7.5 points. Remove comma CINS
• enters the game Should be "entered"

• I think this could be slimmed down by about half. The by-quarter paragraphs are huge and contain probably excessive detail.
• 10-yard-line "10-yard line" etc. (this occurs multiple times in the recap)
• 11-yard-line. From there, Duggan rushed three times and gained 3, 1, and 2 yards, the last of which reached the end zone for a touchdown. There are five yards not accounted for here. Penalty?
• Michigan started the second quarter with a 2nd & 5 from the TCU 24-yard-line, and were unable to pick up the required yardage on their next two plays. Remove comma CinS

Reviewed: 4, 9, 10, 18, 20

No issues.

Are there any relevant images available?