Jump to content

Talk:A166 road

Assessment

Assessed for WP:UKRD - does not quite meet B-class criteria as the "route" section is excessively detailed - see A500 road for a GA-rated article which shows the generally expected style (although a much shorter road, so a bit more detail than this would be fine). In particular the 2-decimal-point mileages between points on the route are not needed for the average reader as they would only need this information if trying to navigate to a destination (Wik.ipedia.Pro is not a guidebook). Otherwise a well-written and interesting article. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 14:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It has taken me a while to get round to doing this. Have removed dead references or replaced with new sources and tidied up the route section. i have added a route table as per suggestion above. Rimmer1993 (talk) 10:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See what we do next...

OR

By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.

Success: You're subscribed now !