Talk:All Dogs Go to Heaven

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the All Dogs Go to Heaven article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wik.ipedia.Pro? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: British / American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the British cinema task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Animation / Cinema / Louisiana / New Orleans Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana - New Orleans (assessed as Mid-importance). Animation: American / European / Films Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, you can the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the European animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Animals in media (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animals in media, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Animals in mediaWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Animals in mediaTemplate:WikiProject Animals in mediaAnimals in media articles United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

...really? 74.32.237.31 (talk) 14:59, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. I removed the category. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 19:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BAAAAH! Sorry. It sort of is. (insert your own jeopardy reference here) It coined the phrase "Big Lipped Alligator Moment", which usually explains an over-the-top scene which has little to no bearing to the plot whatsoever, comes right out of nowhere, and is never mentioned again. The scene also breaks the rules of the movie, where animals are only able to understand their own species, and allows an Alligator and a dog sing a duet. Looking back on this, this is more of a trope than an internet meme. VmKid (talk) 01:48, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, well all we have is your unsupported word that this is true. It's unsourced and I'm removing this as an internet meme. SuperAtheist (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say I have a source for it either, but "Big Lipped Alligator Moment" really is a popular phrase and owes its existence to this film. iNcHicORe (talk) 1:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.53.96.181 (talk)

"UnSuPPoRtEd OpInIoN" Well all we have is your unsupported opinion that it's not. You could try 5 seconds on Google and see that's it's true. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BigLippedAlligatorMoment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.101.185.10 (talk) 03:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

208.4.80.130 (talk) 14:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the words are mispelled.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The budget figure of $13.8 million is attributed to "DonBluth.com Ask Us" but no link was provided. Using the Wayback Machine from the Internet Archive I was able to find a copy of the Ask Us page on DonBluth.com.[1] I have checked the page but the number 13.8 does not appear anywhere. The number 13 appears six times but none of them are in reference to the budget of this film. I searched through the page for more mentions of "All Dogs", I searched the page for "million" (and even the word "thirteen") and there is a general answer about budgets saying "We must get feature budgets down below $20 million" but I am not seeing the figure that was claimed anywhere in that article.

First please mark the current figure in the infobox as {{Failed verification}}. I do not think the budget figure should be removed, it is in the right ballpark and could be correct, but we are simply unable to properly WP:VERIFY it at the moment. Second, if anyone can please provide an alternative budget source that would be great. (Box Office Mojo[2] and The Numbers.com[3] do not list a budget figure for this film.) -- 109.78.199.198 (talk) 18:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, removed as couldn't find a source either. Found mention of the 13.8 from unreliable sources only so could've come from one of them Indagate (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not think the budget figure should have been removed. If you found other sources, even unreliable ones, it might have been helpful to say what they were. Anyway I searched myself and found that the AFI says the budget was $13 million[4] That should be enough to restore the budget. -- 109.78.199.198 (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They were just Reddit and IMDb, not arguably reliable. That looks alright thanks, added it. Recommend you make an account so can edit articles like this Indagate (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

BENRYBENRYBENRY19111998 (talk) 09:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One thing to say.

Gordon Freeman dies in the sequel, I know, I made it happen.

 Not done for now:

1. Please provide reliable sources for your claim.
2. Format specifically, such as "change X to Y" or "add X after Y".
   — Urro^{[talk][edits]} ⋮ 15:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]