Talk:Anne Milton
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Tim Ireland
What is this "Wik.ipedia.Pro code"? Is it a reference to the biographies of living persons thing which says that negative material should be removed if unsourced? If so then it doesn't apply because this is well-sourced. It is a fact that Ireland set up the blog, that he doesn't like Anne Milton, and that Milton refuses to discuss it (the Times link is a good 'un). The link is relevant. There's no quote from the blog included in the section anyway - it just says it exists and allows people to have a look at it.
What we can't have is censorship of stuff that's critical of Anne Milton just because her supporters don't like it. I bet we could all remove stuff like that from articles about our favourite people and say that it should remain off until discussed.
TwoBells
Please, to make the argument that your allegations are 'well-sourced' is to similarly suggest that the BBC are right-wing, it has no reflection in reality. I did however wonder how long it would be before someone cried censorship because their hate-fueled rants were considered irrelevant to the article. Also, you constantly suggest that its Miltons supporters that edit out your diatribe, please do not be surprised that there are some people who consider personal attacks on a factual website abhorrant believe it or not. 5th October 2006 10:12 GMT.
Dr Graham Henderson (husband) & the rewriting of history.
Up until recently, Milton's husband was marked on his LinkedIn page and elsewhere as being Head of Primary Care Relations at Virgin Care Limited. Note, for instance, the entry at zoominfo... https://www.zoominfo.com/p/Graham-Henderson/98398374
cf. it with his current linked-in page, where the mention of his role at Virgin Care have been revised and/or excised https://www.linkedin.com/in/graham-henderson-22461820
As of this hour, today, a search on Google for "Dr Graham Henderson Virgin" yields Graham Henderson | Professional Profile - LinkedIn https://uk.linkedin.com/in/graham-henderson-22461820 View Graham Henderson's profile on LinkedIn, the world's largest professional community. Graham has 4 jobs listed on their profile. ... Accident & Emergency Doctor at Royal Surrey County Hospital. Location: Guildford, United Kingdom ... Medical Director (Surrey). Virgin Care Ltd. April 2012 – Present (5 years 8 months) ...
Whereas the current page points to an end of the directorship as February 2015 with a tenure of '2 years 11 months'. Now, one can argue very strongly that the above do not represent RS, even though linkedIn is often used by journalists and others as an RS. Likewise, WP itself cannot be used as an RS, and we have seen a series of edits from within parliament which indicate changes to this page to excise (or de-emphasise) her husband's relations with Virgin Care Ltd, and so we see Wik.ipedia.Pro being edited for political purposes.
However, what is definitely an RS is the UK Government's Register of Ministers Interests, which can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/list-of-ministers-interests The most recent of which is https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/667965/2017-12-14_List_of_Ministers_Interests_December_2017_FINAL.pdf What we find under Anne Milton is that she has left her "Interests of spouse, partner or close family member" section empty, despite the very strong history (if not current) that her husband has with Virgin Care Ltd.
One could argue that none of this discussion has a place on Anne Milton's page - except that as a minister (and regarding all ministers), the entry on Ministers Interests comes from an RS, is topical, is informative, and belongs to the public domain. (20040302 (talk) 08:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC))
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- C-Class Surrey-related articles
- Low-importance Surrey-related articles
- C-Class Surrey-related articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Surrey articles
See what we do next...
OR
By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.
Success: You're subscribed now !