Talk:Bambuco Bridge

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

North East England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Visual arts: Public art This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles This article is supported by the public art task force. Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article currently tends to bring readers to the impression that this structure is a bridge. However, it does not have "the purpose of providing passage over an obstacle." So how can it be a bridge? I think that this article is giving the wrong impression. It should be re-written to say that it is a "sculpture in the form of a bridge." - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 16:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]