Talk:Big Beach Boutique II

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Concerts Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Concerts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of concerts on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConcertsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ConcertsTemplate:WikiProject Concertsconcert articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sussex Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Whoever wrote this wiki article clearly wasn't there.

Perhaps we can edit it to include the unforgettable experience shared by quarter of a million people 120.22.51.13 (talk) 11:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and also it gives no context to the figures, e.g. is 2 deaths and 6 arrests in the context of an event of 250,000 people actually worse than typical or better - the numbers are presented as implicitly bad but it doesn't include any evidence that this was the case. --2406:E002:6B0A:4301:3171:2DD6:719E:21BE (talk) 02:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It only reports the negative side of the links it cites.

Check each of the links in the article, while the negative are there (and I'm not arguing this shouldn't be mentioned, this article is doesn't meet Wik.ipedia.Pros standards at all. 217.155.14.181 (talk) 22:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to make the article more please feel free to do so, just include reliable sources. harrz ^talk 22:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two people died following the concert - one woman fell from railings hours after the concert itself had finished and a man had a heart attack shortly after it had finished. There were no deaths during the concert itself and neither of them can really be attributed to authorities being under-prepared as implied by the opening paragraph. ^[1] --2406:E002:6B0A:4301:3171:2DD6:719E:21BE (talk) 02:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

1. ^ https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/jul/16/2

Citation needed?

A lot of things can count here, can we at least have a source (and before someone grabs The Argus from that time it's worth pointing out it is very reactionary, much like Tbe Daily Mail or Express. 217.155.14.181 (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]