Jump to content

Talk:Brazil and the United Nations

I can't find it on the web, but there is a simple reason why Brasil always goes first. The reason listed here is the official word, but in reality, if I remember correctly, is that noone wanted to go first and Brazil did go first. Can it be checked ?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Theochino (talk • contribs)

I have no idea. This is the first I've heard about this.--Dali-Llama 15:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified 9 external links on Brazil and the United Nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified 8 external links on Brazil and the United Nations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: WRIT101-04

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 March 2022 and 16 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carolkrein (article contribs).

Possible new section

Hello friends, I am thinking about adding content on Brazil's withdrawal on UN's offer to host their climate change conference. I found the following article: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2139191703/B888DBA4CD74473FPQ/2?accountid=25347

So, I have 2 questions. 1) Do you think it is relevant? 2) Do you think is worth it creating a new section for it or should I add this to one of the existing sections?

Thank you so much! Carolkrein (talk) 21:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Financial contribution section

Hello, I think that the Financial Contribution section could be expanded and more elaborate. I am going to start working on improving it, but would greatly appreciate any help with it from you guys! :)

Thank you, Carolkrein (talk) 21:33, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very inadequate sources

Too much of this article is sourced solely from Brazilian government sources or the U.N., itself. There is a severe lack of independent reliable sources for this article, contrary to Wik.ipedia.Pro guidelines. ~ Penlite (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.Wik.ipedia.Pro.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brazil_and_the_United_Nations&oldid=1247833460"

See what we do next...

OR

By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.

Success: You're subscribed now !