Talk:Chertsey branch line

This article is rated C-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance). Surrey Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Chertsey Branch Line RDT.

Re-directed from Staines to Weybridge Line. Canterberry 23:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The 'mapneeded=yes' tage has been removed, a basic map has been added. Canterberry 23:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Thornbury Branch Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to do some work over the next few weeks to bring this article up to a decent "C" class standard. (I have done this recently for Hampton Court branch line, Shepperton branch line, Tattenham Corner line and Ascot–Ash Vale line.) Principally, I would like to tighten up the text, add a little more information and improve the referencing. Per WP:CITEVAR, would anyone object if I convert the reference format to use Template:sfn?

Thanks and best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 10:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No objections here! Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made these changes. Mertbiol (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]