Talk:Climate change art

This article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wik.ipedia.Pro's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wik.ipedia.Pro:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katherinesteinberger.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 February 2020 and 24 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TyBrown06.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons! I will be moving the additions I made to the "Effects and influence" section, as well as adding a section titled "Arguments against climate change art's effectiveness". PhillipEGruenemay (talk) 02:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Naonoa0000 (article contribs).

All the sources are valid and not outdated, however, I think there's a lot of direct citation especially on the first part of the article which makes a bit difficult to gasp the idea of the original sources. It would be easier to understand the concepts of the original sources if it's paraphrased. Naonoa0000 (talk) 23:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the history section of this article is a bit underrepresented, since it's only citing the sentences from the relevant articles. By making the history section deeper, I believe that it would be easier to understand the following section which is about the influences of the climate change arts. However, I think that the section of effects and influence of climate change art is very detailed and interesting! Naonoa0000 (talk) 23:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that the reception section in this article might be a little biased. Climate change art is a subject with many different perspectives, but this section only includes two articles. The idea of Malcome Miles is very interesting, but I think his article is overrepresented. By adding more perspectives on the climate change art, I believe this section would be more intriguing. Naonoa0000 (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Reception section is too heavily weighted towards Malcom Miles, while he is certainly important and should be included here, there are many other art historians and critics who have dealt with this subject, for example, Lucy Lippard and her 2007 exhibition and the associated book, Weather Report: Art and Climate Change. [1],[2]. The importance of the exhibition was recently re-analyzed in Southwest Contemporary Magazine [3], and previously in 2010 [4].

Other works of relevance include: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], etc. Netherzone (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've begun to clean this article up, and it needs alot more work. It does not accurately represent the genre, nor its history well. I've removed bare embedded urls, some promotional content, moved a couple images. There are still a lot of non-notable artists who are mentioned. The article should not be a repository of individual artists works, but should more accurately represent the genre itself. I'll continue to work on it when I can find the time. Netherzone (talk) 23:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]