Jump to content

Talk:Cod fisheries

Atlantic Cod stock collapse

May I suggest that the following is changed to "Northwest atlantic cod stocks where severely overfished..."?

File:Atlantic-Cod-Stocks.jpg
Atlantic cod stocks were severely overfished in the 1970s and 1980s, leading to their abrupt collapse in 1992
File:Atlantic-Cod-Stocks.jpg
Northwest Atlantic cod stocks were severely overfished in the 1970s and 1980s, leading to their abrupt collapse in 1992

I find the middle right hand example more exact then the top right hand example, since the northeast atlantic cod have yet to really collapse from what I can understand.

An other option would be the bottom right example.

File:Atlantic-Cod-Stocks.jpg
Northwest Atlantic cod stocks were severely overfished in the 1970s and 1980s, leading to their abrupt collapse in 1992


Luredreier 12:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, that is better. Thank you. (It would have been fine if you had just made the change yourself). --Epipelagic (talk) 21:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Modern fishing methods and the fishery collapse

The article states, drawing on an article in an environmental magazine:

In 1951 factory fishing began with new super-trawlers such as the 'Fairtry'; 280 feet long and 2,600 gross tons

This seems to contain several errors. According to Jack Campbell, The Fairtry Experiment (1995), the experimental "Fairfree" sailed from the Clyde to Newfoundland in 1949 (p 26). But it was a converted minesweeper of 1500 tons (p 14). The description does nearly fit the "Fairtry", which was 246 feet long and 2605 tons gross <http://www.aberdeenships.com/single.asp?searchFor=fairtry&index=99213>. But the "Fairtry" was not completed until April 1954 (same and Campbell p 43).

The source article also mis-describes the "Fairtry" in other ways. It says: "It's[sic] superstructure, tall funnels and numerous portholes, suggested an ocean-going passenger liner". However, the "Fairtry" had a low, sweeping superstructure and a single, low and long funnel. And there were two rows of portholes, many fewer than one might expect of an "ocean-going passenger liner".

Yet, with its sweeping lines, the "Fairtry" was beautiful. John Cormie, the chief draughtsman at John Lewis, took his small grandson (myself) to the quayside to see it while it was fitting out and declared with immense pride: "I designed that!". He also said that it was called the "Fairtry" by way of it being a "fair try" at a new type of design. In the illustrations to Campbell's book, John Cormie is the man in a light-coloured coat standing behind Mrs Harper Gow as she prepares to name and launch. --Wikiain (talk) 23:19, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this process stinks

The second paragraph in the Endangered Status section chronicles the process of assigning endangered status. The information appears factual, but the facts presented are biased toward discreting the process in question. For example the quote, "this process stinks". — Preceding unsigned comment added by ALittleSlow (talk • contribs) 16:14, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of objectiveness/weasel words

From the "Collapse..." section:

"Considering the importance of the cod fishery to the livelihood of Canada's coastal communities, as well as the Northern Cod's initial abundance in the region,[50] the fact that the fishery was mismanaged to the extent of collapse – from which to this day it has not recovered – is nothing short of shocking.

In an attempt to make sense of a blunder of such epic proportion, academics have highlighted the following three contributing factors in the eventual collapse of the cod fishery"

How are the phrases "nothing short of shocking" and "a blunder of such epic proportion" even remotely objective? Sounds like weasel words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.110.238 (talk) 01:12, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cod fisheries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cod fisheries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cod fisheries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:59, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified 5 external links on Cod fisheries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence Basques reached New World before Columbus

Please stop repeating that. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that the Basques were fishing off Newfoundland before Columbus reached the New World. Kurlansky provides no evidence at all for that spurious claim. ST1849 (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Both the earliest known voyages with French Basque participation to Terranova (1517 and after) and the earliest known Spanish Basque voyages (1532 and after) were for cod" (Barkham, 1994 book review of Basque Whaling in the 16th century by Jean-Pierre Proulx, p. 277. ST1849 (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well there is evidence of sorts – see, for example, History of Basque whaling#Early claims. The only counter you have provided so far are passionate declamations and an obscure book review someone wrote in 1994. Is your book review available online? — Epipelagic (talk) 21:37, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How the hell is that evidence? Those are just claims all made after the goddamn fact! What are you talking about????? I already answered your goddamn question. Don't be lazy. ST1849 (talk) 23:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where is this "evidence of sorts"? I don't see it. Where is it? Please point it out to me? ST1849 (talk) 00:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.Wik.ipedia.Pro.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cod_fisheries&oldid=1248673019"

See what we do next...

OR

By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.

Success: You're subscribed now !