Talk:Concerted evolution

This article is rated Stub-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the . This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Evolutionary biology Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wik.ipedia.Pro:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't know how to do it, but the page for "Concerted evolution" is a mess! --Prolagus (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here a note:

It is . Concerted Evolution is a process whereby paralogs keep identical--> genconversion of homologs=> see geneconversion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.193.59 (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree it's a mess. I'm not up-to-date on how concerted evolution really works, and I'm really an evolutionary biologist and not a real molecular geneticist. You need someone well-versed in both fields to fix this! I'll do what I can with edits right now... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eratosignis (talk • contribs) 00:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like the term ribosomal DNA. Ribosomes contain RNA not DNA, so the correct term would be ribosomal RNA genes. 194.94.219.248 (talk) 10:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]