Talk:Conservation and restoration of silver objects

This article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Collections Care (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Collections Care, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Collections CareWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Collections CareTemplate:WikiProject Collections CareCollections Care articles

A fact from Conservation and restoration of silver objects appeared on Wik.ipedia.Pro's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that today a conservator-restorer polishes silver objects (pictured) with a homemade slurry of precipitated calcium carbonate and deionized water? A record of the entry may be seen at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Recent additions/2012/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Conservation and restoration of silver objects.

1979 - "...rubb the flagons and chalices from topp to the Bottome, not crosswire, but the Bason and patnes are to be rubb’d roundwise, not acrosse, and by noe means use either chalk, sand, or salt

Something tells me that's not 1979. I'd fix it but I'm not sure what the proper year is. S7evyn (talk) 01:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "for the damp with spoyle it" doesn't make sense. Perhaps the source material said "for the damp will spoyle it"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.30.200.103 (talk) 06:14, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified one external link on Conservation and restoration of silver objects. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927080603/http://www.panna-project.eu/work-packages/wp-3/cleaning-of-a-tarnished-daguerreotype.html to http://www.panna-project.eu/work-packages/wp-3/cleaning-of-a-tarnished-daguerreotype.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]