Talk:Dan Brouthers

	Dan Brouthers has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 24, 2008 Peer review Reviewed July 20, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wik.ipedia.Pro's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 24, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after his Major League Baseball career, Baseball Hall of Famer Dan Brouthers once led the Hudson River League in batting average at the age of 46?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wik.ipedia.Pro's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Baseball: Hall of Fame / Old-time Base Ball / Braves / Dodgers / Phillies High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Hall of Fame task force. This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Atlanta Braves (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Dodgers (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Philadelphia Phillies (assessed as Low-importance). New York (state): Hudson Valley This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Louisville Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance).

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BROO-therz, not BRUDH-erz? And with the th of tooth? kwami 01:19, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BROO-therz.Mannanan51 (talk) 23:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dan Brouthers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

• Looks good and well-written. A couple of the references (hickoksports, tripod.com, geocities.com - I'm not familiar with thebaseballpage.com) look like less-than-reliable personal web pages but none of the info from them seems controversial. A more exhaustive search through Google Book Search could probably glean the same information. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you reviewing the article, I will check out the information I pulled from these websites and see if it essential article information. At least with Hickok, I've used quite a bit for other articles.Neonblak (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've removed the information and references for Hickok and Tripod, but I have not been able to find the same information used from that geocities website. It appears to be well done with good research, and I hesitate to remove the information, as it gives good context of his career in relations to the other sluggers of his era.Neonblak (talk) 04:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've also removed thebaseballpage.com info for the reasons you stated, but I am unable to find the same information that geocities.com page illustrates. Your call on that, but seems pretty reliable, but also scarce.Neonblak (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dan Brouthers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006053411/http://www.baseballlibrary.com:80/ballplayers/player.php?name=Dan_Brouthers_1858 to http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Dan_Brouthers_1858
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604132220/http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Dan_Brouthers_1858&page=chronology to http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Dan_Brouthers_1858&page=chronology

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]