Talk:Foster Report

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scientology Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wik.ipedia.Pro's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wik.ipedia.Pro:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page has zero citations except for one person's personal webpage. How do we know if this is reliable? 195.137.85.173 21:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've queried the statement that the attention given to the Church of Scientology in the early sixties was a result of the controversies over its teachings, policies and activities. This is someone's inference and needs to be justified by a reference; were there any other reasons for the attention? And the Foster, Anderson, Lee and Dumbleton-Powles inquiries were clearly not simultaneous - as evidenced by the dates of their respective reports. DavidCooke 02:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]