Talk:Gelmer Funicular

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: By country series Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the By country series task force. Switzerland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Since there is only one car, this is not actually a funicular. Or is there some other counterweight? JoeBrennan (talk) 20:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To me a gradient of more than 100% is something that can't exist.... --2A02:A03F:26E6:DD00:5541:63CF:BF74:A347 (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• For the rest of the world, a gradient of more than 100% means a slope of more than 45°. 2001:981:4B0C:1:D5DE:9D90:C9B0:1833 (talk) 22:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]