Talk:Joseph Favre

Joseph Favre has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 26, 2022. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wik.ipedia.Pro's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Switzerland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Anarchism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism   Anarchism WikiProject open tasks watch · edit · history · talk · purge Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help? Did you know 07 Jan 2025 – Liceu bombing (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion Articles for deletion 08 Jan 2025 – Kevin Carson (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion (5 participants) Good article nominees 04 Dec 2024 – Los Solidarios (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion 28 Nov 2024 – Alt Llobregat insurrection (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Grnrchst (t · c); start discussion Peer reviews 26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion Articles for creation 13 Dec 2024 – Draft:José de Molina (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by MexicanSoda (t · c) Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (513)

A fact from Joseph Favre appeared on Wik.ipedia.Pro's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 September 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the anarchist chef Joseph Favre (pictured) created a "diabolical" vol-au-vent for the Empress Eugénie? A record of the entry may be seen at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Recent additions/2013/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Favre.

A fact from this article was featured on Wik.ipedia.Pro's Main Page in the On this day section on February 17, 2024.

Not "Dictionnaire universel de cuisine praCtique" Maarten van Thiel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C01:46C2:1900:55CF:CF80:C7DF:8061 (talk) 07:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Favre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 16:21, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.
2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.
3. Contains a short description which complies with recommendations.
4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.
5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.
6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.
7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation.
9. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.
10. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.
11. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.
12. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.
13. No original research.
14. No copyright violations or plagiarism.
15. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.
16. Neutral.
17. Stable.
18. Illustrated, if possible.
19. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright.

I'll be happy to do this review. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 16:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Asilvering. Hope you are well. I have just a few points, including two small changes I've already done.

• I think, per MOS:JOBTITLES, that "bishop of Orléans" should be capitalised as it always references Félix Dupanloup in his official capacity, though not in the generic sense when it is only "the bishop laughed". I have an open mind on this, however. What do you think?

• I wikilinked Valais as a canton only. I agree that countries like Switzerland should not be linked.

• I amended the quotation in the last years section. The reference is normally placed after the colon to precede the blockquote; and in this case it applies to both sentences.

And that is it. This is unquestionably a good article and it passes the review. The man was a culinary genius and I've got an appetite now, after reading the article. I'll do the necessary at WP:GA. Well done and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@No Great Shaker Thanks very much! I see what you mean about the bishop title - I'll change that to capitalize it. -- asilvering (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]