Talk:Newry Democrat

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Northern Ireland This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Ireland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page appears to have been part of an edit war between ex-employees and their supporters, and the paper's new owners, and their supporters. Wik.ipedia.Pro is not a propaganda organ, and neither the "isn't the paper wonderful" nor the "isn't the new owner awful" style is appropriate.

The page as it was clearly breaches NPOV rules.

Entries must be confined to neutral explanatory information; when the paper was founded, where it serves, its format, its owners and editors over time (without personal comment, good or bad), circulation figures with citations, local competitors, and matters of genuine historic or encyclopedic note. Neither venom, nor hagiography is acceptable.

Mpjmcevoy (talk) 12:55, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]