The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wik.ipedia.Pro's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wik.ipedia.Pro's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
The contents of the Faragism page were merged into Nigel Farage on 3 September 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Ok, the statement that "At the 2014 EP election, UKIP won the most seats in the UK, pressuring David Cameron to call the 2016 EU membership referendum" is hilarious but also wildly misleading.
The second part of the lead section detailing Farage's election results mixes domestic and European elections, which is obscured by the bizarre abbreviation of European Parliament to EP, resulting in wildly misleading sentences like "At the 2014 EP election, UKIP won the most seats in the UK".
EP is not a common abbreviation for European Parliament in the UK (the EP disambiguation pages lists over a hundred meanings) and as the quoted sentence is sandwiched between sentences about the general election (the one that most people have heard of), it seems a deliberate attempt to imply that UKIP have ever won a domestic election - or at best, to hide the fact that they've never won a single seat.
Obviously, I propose removing the EP abbreviation, which I think most people assume is a type of record, and separating the domestic from European election results.
(This is presumably related to the fact that the UKIP Wik.ipedia.Pro page [UKIP] lead is full of unsourced claims like the fantastic general election results they got in 2013 and 2015 - how on earth was this allowed?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moubliezpas (talk • contribs) 11:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct that EP is a WP:NEOLOGISM that simply isn't used by anyone, and I've changed that. However I see nothing wrong with putting the facts in chronological order that he lost in general elections and his party did better in European elections. The page David Cameron, for example, doesn't separate elections/referendums by which he succeeded in, and not. Unknown Temptation (talk) 22:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are atleast three references in separate sections about Farage receiving over £ 1mil. a year from his work on the GB News television channel. Apart from some misleading statements and my questioning of the relevance of this fact, I doubt it is needed to mention this at least 3 times in three different sections. Reading the article it sounds like an accusation of wrong-doing instead of a mere fact statement. 2A02:2454:7D24:6B00:B1C9:3861:3CB3:404F (talk) 20:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear single-edit-anon-IP-editor-geolocating-to-Berlin, as far as I can see, the figure of £1m was mentioned only once, at the end of the "Personal life" section. But thank you for highlighting this. This is so much more than most MPs earn that I think it's quite notable and so, on this basis, I have now added it to the lead section. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's entirely relevant to the "Member of Parliament" section, as it was revealed as part of his obligation to the Register of Members' Financial Interests, once he entered parliament. Otherwise no-one else might ever know. Additionally, the estimate that the sum is "significantly higher than that of any other member of parliament", is what makes it notable, and why I think it also belongs in the lead section. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
The redirect Farage riots has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 6 § Farage riots until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 08:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
