Jump to content

Talk:Olegas Truchanas

Change of status

Agree lack of either a photo or further details seem to suggest B was too generous SatuSuro 07:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Migration law requirement

Upon arriving in Tasmania, Truchanas worked for a zinc company in Hobart for two years, as was necessary under Australian migration law of the time.

Can this be explained a little more clearly? What exactly was the general legal requirement? It surely can't have been as specific as working in a zinc company in Hobart. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:00, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Olegas Truchanas/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This needs to have in line citations to be B class.--Grahame (talk) 11:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 01:48, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Significance of Lake Pedder photographs

‘After taking what are now among the only remaining records of the pre-dam Lake Pedder…’ implies photographs, and that they constitute the bulk of the photographic record, or even of all records, but is explicit about neither, and needs clarification. HuwG 124.148.151.50 (talk) 08:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See what we do next...

OR

By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.

Success: You're subscribed now !