Talk:Quantum key distribution

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quantum key distribution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wik.ipedia.Pro? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is rated B-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

‹See TfM› Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computer science Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet Cleanup : Computer science articles needing attention Computer science articles needing expert attention  : Computing Expand : Computer science Infobox : Computer science articles without infoboxes Maintain : Timeline of computing 2020–present Photo : Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists) Computing articles needing images Stubs : Computer science stubs Unreferenced : WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs Project-related : Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}} Cryptography: Computer science Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the . This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Mid-importance).

To-do list for Quantum key distribution: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2015-09-22 Enlarge and correct the E91 section: The "S" in the E91 section is not defined. Further, the section has ${\displaystyle |S|=-2{\sqrt {2}}}$ which is not possible as it has a nonnegative equal to a negative. Add other protocol descriptions (CV, B92, DPS, SARG04 etc.) Illustrate with diagrams [1], [2] and maybe photos of a QC setup

Quantum key distribution has been linked from multiple high-traffic websites. All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. Table 13 May 2010 Slashdot link Traffic 17 May 2010 Slashdot link Traffic

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

I think that the sentence "the protocol is designed with the assumption that an eavesdropper (referred to as Eve) can interfere in any way with both [channels]" is a too strong statement. I think it's okay for Eve to do anything with the quantum channel and to eavesdrop classical channel but if she could intercept and resend the classical channel when they comapre they measurements she could ruin everything. Panina-manina (talk) 12:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's laughable that the classical channel has to be secure beforehand to establish secure quantum communications. Bright☀ 19:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the chance of being noticed is 1-(1/2)^n as Alice & Bob will only be comparing bits where their bases match, therefore Eve had a 50% chance of guessing the right basis in this situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.176.3.122 (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

in "Future" it is said that "The major difference of quantum key distribution is the ability to detect any interception of the key, whereas with courier the key security cannot be proven or tested". This is plain wrong considering MITM. An interception can only be detected if you are perfectly sure that the photons arriving are the very same you have send. The only real difference is that, if only eavesdropping has occurred on the very same photons which still arrive, the QKD key will be automatically trash, while classically distributed keys must be manually trashed. Key interception in general (in terms of MITM) must be independently detected for both, QKD and classic key distribution, unlike the above quote hints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arrobbe (talk • contribs) 10:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of the premises of Schneier's remark, appearing very early on in the cited text, is

"The idea behind quantum crypto is that two people communicating using a quantum channel can be absolutely sure no one is eavesdropping. "

This is not the idea behind quantum key distribution (QKD). The idea is that provided that the protocol has been executed correctly the users may upper bound correctly any leaked information. They may then use classical privacy amplification algorithms to distill a secret key or start over if too much information has leaked. The role of quantumness is to guarantee that the upper bound is correct.

A second mistake in this premise is that the users will not use the quantum channel for communication. The classical channel will be used for communication and the quantum channel merely facilitates the sharing of the secret key that will be used to encrypt the classical messages.

I will proceed to remove the sentence quoting Schneier's remark soon if I don't hear otherwise.2001:14BA:A701:79A4:0:0:0:1 (talk) 09:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are right about him being wrong. Although, it is a citation from a very prominent cryptographer, and should not be removed, but rather contradicted by another citation. Or just left there, as a quote, and let the reader decide for itself whether it is true or not. To be more clear, the statement "in relation to QKD this famous guy said this-and-that" is true, despite that "this-and-that" might be false. (Wik.ipedia.Pro probably have multiple policies about removing cited stuff, but by inaction, i am willing to break those policies, since I think your version is more pedagogic.)

Second, a quantum channel could be used to carry the data. Why not. For example, using superdense coding. Although during this century, humanity will likely be using classical data channels ;) In other words, the statement that the ciphertext messages then are transmitted over only classical channels is false. · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 14:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cjiang8, Oliviazorrilla (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Lucluc97, Mauryan11.

— Assignment last updated by Za49 (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]