Talk:Robert Brackman

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wik.ipedia.Pro's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Visual arts This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles Smithsonian Institution: Archives of American Art Low‑importance This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWik.ipedia.Pro:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the . This article is supported by WikiProject Archives of American Art.

A fact from this article was featured on Wik.ipedia.Pro's Main Page in the On this day section on September 25, 2020.

Give me a break..Your tags look like vandalism..The guy was a famous teacher at the Art Students League. I added references. What is your problem? Modernist (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what Damiens.rf means by "I have also made paitings of Miirrha Alhambra at home, but she wasn't present and the painting were never exposed (only by my close friends fan pages" but if he has made paintings of Miirrha Alhambra and his close friends fan pages show them, I'd be most interested to see them. Certainly a photograph of an original signed portrait by Brackman, posted online should show that he did a painting of this person. Doc ♬ talk 00:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The paintings should be exposed in some more reliable place than his friend's fan pages. The recently added source for Abby Aldrich Rockefeller, for instance, is excellent.

Moderninst, if you want to remove the tags, you'll have to agree to remove everything that isn't covered by reliable sources. --Damiens.rf 15:46, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, this is the article without unsourced information. If you prefer, revert it to the tagged version. But the version with unsourced information but without the tags is unnaceptable. --Damiens.rf 15:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding? This is a referenced article about an artist. I would suggest that you seem to have a vendetta here that is both excessive and illogical..see WP:IDON'TLIKEIT and then see WP:UCS. As for sources - there is a book about the guy - that you deleted! That uh, counts as a source..as does the other references like the links to his work...or to the Art Students League..Modernist (talk) 16:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would be easier here to start addressing specifics. Damiens, may I suggest you put here what you consider to be the worst example of what you object to, so that a resolution can be agreed, i.e. one source that you think doesn't meet WP:RS, or one statement that you think needs to be verified, but which isn't. We can then solve that and take it from there. Ty 16:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robert Brackman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100120105443/http://www.theartstudentsleague.org/past_instructors.html to http://www.theartstudentsleague.org/past_instructors.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160314023614/http://www.nationalacademy.org/academy/national-academicians/ to http://www.nationalacademy.org/academy/national-academicians/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100605014225/http://www.marylandartsource.org/artists/detail_000000112.html to http://www.marylandartsource.org/artists/detail_000000112.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]