Jump to content

Talk:Shikotan District, Hokkaido

Proposed merger to Shikotan

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of the discussion was merge. --Nemoschool (talk) 00:54, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I am wrong, and I do not believe that I am, this page and Shikotan are about the exact same geographical area, which is the disputed Shikotan/Spanberg Island in the Kurils.

I understand that the subject of this page is about the political district, and not the island itself; but due to the fact that they are mutually inclusive of each other, plus the ongoing territorial dispute, I am following the "disputed regions" guideline in WP:GEOLAND, and recommend the merger per criteria "1. duplicate" and "3. short text" of WP:MERGEREASON. --Nemoschool (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tlhslobus, MChew, Bizkit Wizperer, KNewman, Ymblanter, Nihonjoe, Widr, Nik42, and Amake: I kindly ask for your comments... --Nemoschool (talk) 19:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it makes sense. It is of course awkward that the article is about a Japanese entity, and the island is currently Russian, but redirects should solve this problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I support merging them. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(I'm only replying because I was pinged above). I have no views on the matter either way. Tlhslobus (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

See what we do next...

OR

By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.

Success: You're subscribed now !