Talk:Slaughterhouse
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Slaughterhouse article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
Wik.ipedia.Pro is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wik.ipedia.Pro's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pork Plant Clarification (FYI)
To answer a previous question, the USDA does allow downer pigs to be slaughtered.
Also, regarding design considerations... There have been some recent changes in design concepts for the movement of pigs into stunning systems. New designs have eliminated single-file corrals and have instead implemented a type of 'batch processing' method which moves small groups (about 8 for CO2 stunning--depends on machine design) of pig into the stunning area. This greatly reduces the stress level of the animal before stunning. We also eliminated prods and now use an automated herding system. I have seen the new Butina dual backloaders in action (CO2 stunning system) and it is much better than the old single-file system we replaced. In fact, to effectively pass an animal stress audit, you about have to eliminate single-file herding and prodding.
AC
Etymology
The OD of Etymology doesn't corroborate the etymology offered for "Shambles," and the point of the passage seems to be to editorialize about slaughter, not to provide useful information. I cut it. (Ethan Mitchell, Feb 25, 2006)
NPOV
This whole article smacks of a vegetarian/vegan wet dream, sure they'd all like to ban meat production first off, but does this article need to reflect that? How about some actual reality in the article, to give it some balance? ZL3XD (talk) 09:56, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- It does seem rather strange that an article about something would include a footer full of links to things that oppose it, and none to anything actually related to the meat industry. It also included veganism in the "see also" section, which seems rather odd. The article should be focusing on slaughterhouses, not what certain people think about slaughterhouses. - Alltat (talk) 17:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Oops
With respect to this edit, I had meant to make a dummy edit for attribution purposes that included just adding a space, not to restore the vandalism. I'm deeply sorry that I accidentally restored the vandalism in doing so. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)\]
- I wondered if somebody had hacked your account! All right now.Ttocserp 16:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wik.ipedia.Pro objectionable content
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wik.ipedia.Pro level-5 vital articles in Technology
- C-Class vital articles in Technology
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Agriculture articles
- Mid-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- Start-Class Architecture articles
- Unknown-importance Architecture articles
- Start-Class Food and drink articles
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- C-Class Animal rights articles
- Top-importance Animal rights articles
- WikiProject Animal rights articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
See what we do next...
OR
By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.
Success: You're subscribed now !