Talk:Southwark Towers

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skyscrapers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I've got a better picture, but my account won't let me upload it! Here it is: [1] Oliver7649 (talk) 19:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We need a better picture as it doesn't actually look like that. Secretlondon 23:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest merging with the site as the building currently stands at 32 London Bridge and will be replaced with another building to give a full and accurate history of the site I think merging is needed. Also this article will lack notability when the building is demolished.--Lucy-marie (talk) 11:55, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article currently at 32 London Bridge is probably about to be moved back to Shard London Bridge, see Talk:32 London Bridge#Requested move. This is reversing a unilateral move made by the proposer of this merge, who has been involved in the discussion there from the start, so the merge proposal is really part of that move discussion. Suggest that this discussion be centralised on that talk page, where the proposer has already created a section for it, see Talk:32 London Bridge#Merger. Andrewa (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above statement is pre-empting the outcome of an ongoing open discussion. The merits of the merger should be discussed on it merits and not on the perceived outcome of another discussion.--Lucy-marie (talk) 23:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since this proposal doesn't seem to have been considered since December 2007, I will remove the template. See Talk:Shard London Bridge. --Oldak Quill 04:35, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This was discussed back in 2007. The consensus then was not to merge. Dormskirk (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified one external link on Southwark Towers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120103121939/http://gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=478894&version=1&template_id=57&parent_id=56 to http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=478894&version=1&template_id=57&parent_id=56

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]