Talk:Verkehrsbetriebe Luzern

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Switzerland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Buses This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars. More information: /  This article lacks references. It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

No apparent independent notability – Muboshgu (talk) 18:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The AfD Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Nachtstern should have been allowed to be extended. The editor who requested its undeletion did not even participate in the discussion themselves. Ajf773 (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Take it up with the closing admin. There is no requirement that the undeletion requester participate in the deletion discussion. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Simply redirected - there's zero cited information to merge. Feel free to add cited information to this article.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Seems appropriate. Nachtstern had been nominated for deletion by me, so I'm comfortable with it. Ajf773 (talk) 09:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst reworking parts of the page I noticed that the Rolling Stock section is heavily outdated, I looked for newer Information but none was to be found. What are other solutions than removing the whole section or leaving it outdated? Ferieninsel001 (talk) 23:22, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]