Talk:WKKX

This article is rated Start-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Radio Stations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: West Virginia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Besides the fact that the majority of the "controversy" is unsourced, the whole section reads more like a gossip column than an encyclopedia, right down to the concluding "Classic radio!" Unless the section can be sourced and the tone improved, it should probably be removed. --Moonriddengirl 23:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why should we remove information for the sake of it. An encyclopedia should include as much information as possible. This is not listing information, this is extrapolating on the station. 76.125.203.191 (talk) 04:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Concerned reader[reply]

For all the schedule information that was removed (most of it out of date anyway), please see WP:NOT#DIR. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]