Template talk:Anime Grand Prix

This template does not require a rating on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga This template is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles

As with any "winners" navbox, only the winners should be listed. Those that came in second or third place are not winners. This isn't the Olympics. —Farix (t | c) 18:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um...silver and bronze are both still winners. They just didn't win first place (gold). If they weren't winners, they wouldn't get medals. Now fourth place, that's a different story altogether. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, winners should be limited to first place winners, not the top three. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:MOS-AM, we should always use the official English language title of a work in the navbox. If there are no official English language titles, then use the most common English title used by reliable sources. —Farix (t | c) 18:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]