Template talk:Parapsychology

This template does not require a rating on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Parapsychology (inactive) This template is within the scope of WikiProject Parapsychology, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ParapsychologyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ParapsychologyTemplate:WikiProject ParapsychologyParapsychology articles Psychology This template is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Paranormal This template falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles Skepticism This template is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles

@OlduvaiGeorge: I don't think that was vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 18:48, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revert if you disagree. I won't object a second time, although a discussion might have been in order. Cheers. OlduvaiGeorge (talk) 21:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to revert anything. Here's the content of your revert -- you removed Ectoplasm, Electronic voice phenomenon, and Thoughtography -- why? This is lazy reverting. You should add or remove the specific links that you intend to add or remove, not just do a wholesale revert. Your explanation for it wasn't good either, as the edits were not WP:Vandalism. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 09:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Hitching/ Colin Wilson a couple of writers who devolved into paranormal crankery in minor publications, no evidence they were full time or notable parapsychologists — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven37644 (talk • contribs) 00:51, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]