User talk:AgentPolkaDot

If you wish to engage in a dialogue, I welcome you to leave a comment.

I have reported your violation of the three-revert rule. I agree there are sourcing problems, but using all-caps doesn't help your case (including in edit summaries).Jasper Deng (talk) 23:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It never ceases to amaze me how many hall monitors there are here, all without a clue with regards to editorial responsibility. I look forward to reading your full report.

What I'm really appalled at here is incivility, as you showed in this edit summary. Given these, it's quite likely the page will be protected from editing or someone will be blocked. I believe Eeekster is biting you here, and it can be tough. I'm glad to see that you started a talk page discussion, while Eeekster's been ignoring it; in fact, he indeed may be blocked for this.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pilif12p 23:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Occupy Cal. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) 23:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]