User talk:Edgartn30

Hello, I'm GrayStorm. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jojon without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wik.ipedia.Pro with an accurate . If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GrayStorm^{(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.)} 23:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Jojon. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wik.ipedia.Pro's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 23:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with your youtube channel though! -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 00:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wik.ipedia.Pro article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wik.ipedia.Pro.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wik.ipedia.Pro's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO - requires significant coverage about the individual in multiple independent secondary sources. YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Youtuber Jojon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wik.ipedia.Pro's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Edgartn30! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wik.ipedia.Pro where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]