Jump to content

User talk:Goltak

]

Hussein Darbouk

Greetings Goltak, Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Hussein Darbouk--It would be great if you could also add references to the related article Al Maya.

Have a good day!Amy Z (talk) 19:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Germany

Welcome, Goltak, to the WikiProject Germany! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Germany-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Germany}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks you can do. Please remove completed tasks from the list.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! Agathoclea (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fips Asmussen

Can't believe he hasn't been covered yet. Good job! I've tagged the article for now, but will get to work editing it soon. noisy jinx huh? 19:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wik.ipedia.Pro pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Der Stechlin and Oxford Companion to German Literature

This article seems to be essentially the same text as the referenced article, which is marked as copyrighted by OUP. AllyD (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Goltak (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Vote on Syrian Talk page

I set up a vote on whether to include alqaeda in the infobox.

http://en.Wik.ipedia.Pro.org/wiki/Talk:2011–2012_Syrian_uprising Sopher99 (talk) 20:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 47 soldiers executed

It doesn't matter if they werent part of the FSA yet, I never said they were part of the FSA, but they WERE part of the collective syrian opposition the moment they decided to rebel. Every major media outlet and organisation is calling them defectors and the casualties section in the article clearly states army defectors. It would be more wrong to present them as loyalist fatalities, they stopped being loyalists the moment they decided to defect. You should take a look at this [1] opposition website. It lists all civilians and FSA/military allied with the opposition. And on their military fatalities list they clearly list all of the 47 soldiers killed. Thus the opposition themselves have declared them part of their movement. In any case they most certainly weren't loyalists. EkoGraf (talk) 04:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's the main problem there, what you just told me. All you are saying, about them going home, them not being part of the opposition officialy, sunni soldiers killed while fighting for the government weren't actually loyalists cause they didn't get a chance to defect and such is simple personal speculation on your part and borderline OR (Original research). Wik.ipedia.Pro is based on facts and sources and the fact (sources) is both the opposition and the international media has termed them as defectors and part of the opposition (opposition has put them on their list of military alligned to the opposition). Anything farther than that is your personal opinion which in all due respect doesn't count on Wik.ipedia.Pro, only sources. We edit per the sources and only per the sources (which all say they were defectors), please put your personal feelings and thoughts on the side. Please stick to the basic Wik.ipedia.Pro rule, verifiability, and please don't go in the direction of OR and personal POV. Friendly advice. Thank you. EkoGraf (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul Rahman Orfalli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul Rahman Orfalli is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/Abdul Rahman Orfalli until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 12:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goltak, Thanks for your work to improve Houma massacre, but beware of cutting and pasting large amounts of text, as you did here.[2] This falls under WP:COPYVIO; it's important that we re-write our sources in our own words. Let me know if you have any questions. Khazar2 (talk) 21:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Government death toll

I have removed from the main article on the conflict the death toll provided by the government because it was becoming out-of-date. The last civilian deaths number was back from March, 3,600, the last rebel deaths number was back from September of last year, 700, since than they only sporadicly updated that, and the last number for security forces deaths was a week ago, when it was approaching 4,000 and came in line with the SOHR number. If a new and fresh number is provided by the government I will add it. For now the numbers are SOHR, VDC, UN, Shuhada and the LCC. But I'm thinking of removing the LCC number because they have not provided a solid overall number for two months now. Will have to think about that some more. EkoGraf (talk) 18:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR number

The SOHR number of defectors dead is highly unrealistic given what other sources say. Two other opposition sources have listed by name well over 1,700 dead defectors, while SOHR has just only spouted out a number, without any fatalities list. A complete fatalities list provided by Shuhada and the VDC trump SOHR in that point. 2 sources vs 1. It's misleading promoting SOHR's number of 870 dead defectors when two other sources have forwarded a complete list of over 1,700. SOHR isn't really reliable anyway on the point of tracking rebel fatalities given that they themselves have declared they count rebels who were not defectors as civilians. That's why the note is in the infobox, to warn people about the inclusion of rebels in the civilian toll. And not just warn them about SOHR but the others as well given they are also only counting defectors as rebels, but it seems Shuhada and the VDC are much more thorough than SOHR on that point. The only reason SOHR's number of government troops dead is being used is because recently SOHR's number has overlapped with the government tally. EkoGraf (talk) 15:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was stated that the opposition groups count civilians as rebels, long before SOHR openly admitted it, by many political analysts and journalists (sources provided in the article: al jazeera, al arabiya, al akhbar, rt, etc). So what if one is allegedly in contact with the Syrian goverment? All journalists are in contact with them to relay their point of view. Of course the other opposition groups are counting as well, both Shuhada and the VDC, it is simple and pure logic and math if you look at the numbers. Please look at it from a neutral standpoint. The VDC claims 13,328 civilians and the rest defectors, the Shuhada claims 17,000+ civilians and the rest defectors. And they say those numbers are the total number of all people killed by government troops. But where are the rebels that weren't defectors in those numbers if those are the totals? Simply put they are all doing it, otherwise they are lacking at least 2,000 or more civilians turned rebels in their totals, which they are not because they say those are the definite totals. In my opinion it wouldn't be neutral and it would be highly misleading for the readers not to state that the opposition is counting certain rebels as civilians. The fact is if you look at it realisticly the opposition is confirming it itself by saying that the numbers the other activist groups are saying are the definite totals (minus the government troops) and at the same time are confirming that thousands of civilians are turning into rebel fighters. EkoGraf (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, forgot one more thing, isn't the LCC openly stating in its reports when a rebel fighter (any fighter) dies and are counting them in their totals? And, per the LCC itself, they and the VDC are coordinating their counts. I think that says it all. EkoGraf (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I don't think there is a need for a Khan Sheikoun article. The fight for the town was short (2 days) and, for Syrian standards, bloodless (just 6 dead). We should try and not make too many articles on non-notable events and small skirmishes. Due to already being several of these articles me and Elsworth were already talking about merging some of them into unified articles or redirecting them to the timeline articles due to a large number of them being just on or two sentences big. EkoGraf (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Half Barnstar
Syrian Uprising! Fanzine999 (talk) 17:32, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Treymseh massacre

Already made the page. Sopher99 (talk) 22:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Damascus

You reverted all of my edits what's the meaning of it? I listed the events in encyclopydic and chronological order and fixed the references and you reverted it ALL. :( EkoGraf (talk) 19:29, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted them all and I already sorted it in chronological order. Be more careful in the future please. EkoGraf (talk) 19:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Damascus bombing move proposal

Hi, could you voice your opinion on this matter Talk:18_July_2012_Damascus_suicide_bombing. I don´t want to get into another edit war with that "editor" and consensus about it should be easily made. EllsworthSK (talk) 16:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Edit Summaries

Thank you for your contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro. I noticed your recent edit to 2011–2012 Damascus clashes does not have an . Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!- 220 of Borg 19:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hassan al-Ibrahim

The article Hassan al-Ibrahim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing notable about him. WP:NOTMEMORIAL

While all contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yazan (talk) 11:23, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rajeh Mahmoud

The article Rajeh Mahmoud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTMEMORIAL

While all contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yazan (talk) 11:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mohammed al-Awwad

The article Mohammed al-Awwad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTMEMORIAL

While all contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yazan (talk) 11:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Closing remarks on splitting procedure for "Battle of Al-Qusayr"

Dear user, you have participated in the splitting procedure for the article "Battle of Al-Qusayr". Please check the talk page of this article for closing remarks at Talk:Battle_of_Al-Qusayr#Split. Thank you.Greyshark09 (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali Khalifa el-Zaidi

The article Ali Khalifa el-Zaidi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wik.ipedia.Pro policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 03:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wik.ipedia.Pro arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contests

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wik.ipedia.Pro:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wik.ipedia.Pro:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 08:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wik.ipedia.Pro coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wik.ipedia.Pro, including the English Wik.ipedia.Pro! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wik.ipedia.Pro, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Country Winners
  • Diversity winner
  • High quality contributors
  • Gender-gap fillers
  • Page improvers
  • Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of the article "2019 in Italy" in English Wik.ipedia.Pro

Hello, Goltak. Happy New Year to you! 2019 is coming soon. Can you creat the article "2019 in Italy" in English Wik.ipedia.Pro? Thanks a lot!
123.150.182.179
16:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wik.ipedia.Pro articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wik.ipedia.Pro, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

  • Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
  • Diversity winner
  • Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wik.ipedia.Prons all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wik.ipedia.Pro!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Retrieved from "https://en.Wik.ipedia.Pro.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Goltak&oldid=1139102119"

See what we do next...

OR

By submitting your email or phone number, you're giving mschf permission to send you email and/or recurring marketing texts. Data rates may apply. Text stop to cancel, help for help.

Success: You're subscribed now !