User talk:Haus

Here are my thoughts on retiring from the project. Lots of people want to be admins. The quickest way to become an admin is to delete a lot of stuff. WP:IDONTLIKEIT is, albeit improperly, a fundamental criteria and motivation for many or most items brought up for deletion. Of course this motivation is dressed up in the guise of other guidelines and policies, but, c'mon folks, the patterns are unmistakable.

In the final analysis - why spend time writing stuff so a 12-year-old can get the admin bit 5 years from now for deleting it? Life is too short.

Cheers. Haus^Talk 16:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bowditch-fig-404-a.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bowditch-fig-404-b.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I wrote, I sent it via email as I wasn't sure you would see it here: Hi - I see that you are retired from Wik.ipedia.Pro, but I thought I would email you for two reasons: 1. to thank you very much for all your work early on in getting the Organized Labour project running and helping build the structure that we have today. 2. try to encourage you to come back to work on the project again. Not sure if it matters much to you, but there is at least one active and friendly labour project person who's happy to collaborate. With respect, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the note. I forgot how to indent, so... woops. After 8 years I'm still kind of dispirited by the deletionist jihad and almost all the interactions I have with Wik.ipedia.Pro other than as a consumer are deletion notices. So, again thanks, but that part of my life is over. Best of luck to you! Haus^Talk 16:54, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mike-quill.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Requests for Maritime Trades peer review requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wik.ipedia.Pro. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Maritime trade. The discussion will occur at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 26#Maritime trade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 22:40, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nef (ship). The discussion will occur at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 12#Nef (ship) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:49, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shipping industry statistics has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Xlate-fr-en has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPTRANSPORT/Task force categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPTRANSPORT/Checklist categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPTRANSPORT/YesNo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Maritime Trades has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Transport articles with incomplete B-Class checklists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Italic ship title has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of convenience has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]