User talk:LostHavoc

Please leave a new message.

Archives

1

Heeey. Here is The archive page for refs. When we add refs, I think it's a good idea we archive them as dead links are becoming a problem. Criticly anything from Holysoap or official HO website... because they delete pages often. I archived all of the refs on brendan's article to start it off. All's you need to do is put the url and your email, (Non of the other fields on the form are needed and it makes a link back..) .. You know Ste's page, do you think it's a good idea if we rid of the image where Ste returns to Amy? It isn't really a pivitol moment IMO and is vilating the fair use rationale.. all images on the page are non free images, there are 4, if a fifth is added a bot notifies and all are tagged for deletion... (I reckon if nopticed they would delete all but the infobox one..)RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 21:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed. I wish Channel 4 hadn't changed their website haha. Yeah, that's a good idea though. As for Ste's page, I agree the image is rather pointless tbh. Shall I request speedy deletion? I could just remove it from the Ste and Amy articles and it will be nominated for deletion anyway. LostHavoc(talk) 22:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've just requested deletion anyway. LostHavoc(talk) 22:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ADF for that one, speedy is for newly uploaded articles or images. .. but anyway, if you want an image gone you just remove it, edit the image page and state orphaned, it gets deleted without discussion so no hanger on's come and save it (Eg. the image uploader). :P Same, C4's website had more pages such as Caroline and co, plus interviews with various oldies.. but oh well. Urg, people edit articles for SL's only and just relink characters that are already linked, Cheryl's page has more SL's added and no actor names.. grrr lol (Rather hot episode of HO on E4 earlier, wasn't it.. lol)RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 22:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Damn. I'm rubbish at image-related stuff haha. :L and yes, it was! I'm trying to figure out if it's wrong to fancy Brendan lmao. LostHavoc(talk) 10:51, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The new List of minor Hollyoaks characters (2010) material is good, but I don't see the point of deleting the other part. Why not resubmit new material and then work on old?

best regards, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 12:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the information from that section to its own article, Bart McQueen. LostHavoc(talk) 12:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Good move! --UnicornTapestry (talk) 14:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! The Hollyoaks pages are all lovely, lovely, lovely! Especially the locations page! Organised, detailed and informative - I was very happy and wouldn't have made any changes :)! (as of 6th November 2010, 00:42) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.157.1.180 (talk) 00:42, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the locations article is fairly good at the moment. Information about fire week will have to be added to affected properties though once the fire is over. :P LostHavoc(talk) 02:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course, but don't worry, I'm sure you'll have no bother! Plus, I think people will only move out temporarily until their homes get fixed. Also, I love the way you have previous employees for most things, but like I suggested, don't have them for Cincerity as when those ex-employees worked there, it was not caled Cincerity and it was a former business, which usually goes futher down the page! :)

		The Reviewer's Barnstar
		First off, congratulations on becoming a Reviewer! I just wanted to drop by and say that you're doing great! Endofskull (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thankyou for that, much appreciated. :D LostHavoc(talk) 23:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was something how she left... no mention on Hollyoaks official website, all quick... she's in the titles... Steph and Mal were removed after their final appearances, they do seem to update the titles regularly too now.RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 00:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed she was in the titles and I did wonder why the website haven't had a 'Amy's best bits' thing like other characters. Hmm, probably better revert my edits. I never know whether to trust Hollyoaks these days with scenes being cut etc. :) LostHavoc(talk) 00:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah perhaps for now, maybe they are playing games... I know though, when all four... Elliot, Dom, Mal and Amy were reported, HO website only reported the stories of the guys leaving... Davies hasn't done any promo for her exit what so ever, I just thought that was incase she died in the fire and they wanted her to keep quiet... but no it's like is she even going? lolRAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 00:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, only Glen, Garnon and John spoke about their decisions to leave in the Digital Spy report, Ashley hasn't commented (at least I don't think she has). I don't think she has a Twitter either, so we can't tell by her tweets, even though Twitter can't always be reliable, it can give us hints. Waveguide doesn't mention Amy either, but then again the spoilers on all websites have been wrong for a few weeks now. I guess we'll just have to wait and see. :) LostHavoc(talk) 18:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just read about India, that's quite a scary way to kill her off. Quite shocked at it. Suppose it makes her a notable character finally...RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 01:12, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know, same! :O I'm shocked too, it'll be interesting to watch, I don't think any soaps have done a death like this before. Good on Paul Marquess for finding something original to do :) LostHavoc(talk) 01:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh also, brilliant work on Steph's article! :D LostHavoc(talk) 01:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, I nominated it for GA... I just want more HO articles to GA atm. .. are you going to Nominate Brendan and Ste? (I've noticed you have done lots of work on them now, very good too.)

I've nominated Ste, not sure about Brendan right now, do you think it could pass? LostHavoc(talk) 16:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suppose Ste alone is okay for now, as I'm sure lots more Brendan stuff is upcoming we can add in the future.. About Clare and co, they were just flackbacks from before. So is it best to re-do their last appearance..?RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 20:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I've thought about this, it would be best to keep the mention of their final appearance in the opening but since they were flashbacks, revert the final appearance in infobox. I'll go and change the Infoboxes back. :) LostHavoc(talk) 20:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HollieJayBowes1096.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wik.ipedia.Pro constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wik.ipedia.Pro page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Dog in the Pond.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wik.ipedia.Pro uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wik.ipedia.Pro:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done LostHavoc(talk) 18:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This ref here reveals that Cameron, is played by Cameron Moore. It has Jeff Rawle down as playing Silas Blissett who is Heidi's dad who comes to stay with them at xmas... So he's posing as this Cameron, but he's still the killer, should we change the names on the pages?RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 03:57, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I guess that will be the surprise Jeff Rawle mentioned then. :P Yeah I think we should change the names, better to do it now before he arrives tbh. I wonder what role Cameron will have then, since he's been cast. LostHavoc(talk) 13:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed the section on List of Hollyoaks characters (2010). I haven't added Trish or Mitzeee to his family yet because they might not be related, if Heidi's mother is Trish's sister. LostHavoc(talk) 13:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you keep an eye out to see who plays this Ciara girl in tomorrow's C4 hollyoaks please?RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 22:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure. I noticed her in the credits earlier on E4, but I didn't catch the actress's name. Tbh, I actually thought it was Liberty haha. :') LostHavoc(talk) 23:06, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tired of certain editors changing as they please, ignoring our warnings. I'm going to report them, I think Pringlepan is one of the biggest problematic Hollyoaks editors, theres an IP that adds middle names for the McQueen's, it's so in universe it doesn't matter. We go by what the character is known as don't we? I wish there was a column for middle names in the info box..RAIN..the..ONE ^HOTLINE 13:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same, I've just given PringlePan a final warning. As for the middle names, perhaps we could bring it up on the Infobox talk page? Just to see what other editors think. LostHavoc(talk) 13:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...on the Ste Hay article. It was a mess before! Well done.~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 18:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou :) and sorry for the late reply. :P LostHavoc(talk) 00:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LostHavoc, I've started reviewing this article after it's languished at GAC forever. I wanted to check in with you, though, and see if it was all right if I did a copyedit, which is something I tend to do when I review an article. I also tend to be quite WP:BOLD, so let me know if that's okay, too. I'm a soap fan, too, but of American ones, which I know doesn't even hold a candle to your Brit ones. And I think your nerdy-ness--that you'd spend so much time on WP--is so cool. Cheers! ;) Christine (talk) 21:50, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W93., educational institution IP 149.157.1.180 seems at it again, at Claddagh ring. We think it's kids playing around, as they are wont to do when at school with little to do and less to get. But could you pop over to the IP talk page? I have left a message already, but I suspect that this IP should be blocked for good.76.195.85.160 (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Are you still here btw, haven't seen you around and you are the best hope for the HO articles seeings as you are the best damn editor they have. (Plus together we kick the project into shape.)Rain the 1 ^BAM 02:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Daniel Raven requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wik.ipedia.Pro. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just asking if you want this newsletter. If not tell me, if yes tell me! MayhemMario 15:19, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject EastEnders Newsletter Volume 1 - June 2011
Project news Welcome to the new EE newsletter! This is a new thing that I am trying out, so make sure once it's out, give me feedback! If you want to recieve the newsletter, just tell me on my userpage. We are looking for new editors for the newsletter for future issues. If you are interested in helping shape the newsletter to focus on new areas or submit individual stories, we can use your help! The newsletter can be edited by all members of the project, and we are always seeking new volunteers. Instructions will be provided on how to develop the newsletter each month. Any interest and/or questions can be submitted to MayhemMario. One EE article is available for review at WP:GAN. This is Yusef Khan. As members of this project are more familiar with WP:EE guidelines for EE articles, input at these reviews can be helpful for determining if they meet all good criteria. Other articles can also be found at WP:PR looking for helpful comments. Based on views, the top five most popular character articles from our project this month were: Mandy Salter, Syed Masood, Tanya Branning, Ronnie Mitchell, and Janine Butcher. For a list of our project's top 500 most popular articles, see here. Consider helping to improve one of these articles that is seen by thousands to millions of people each month. Remember to always add the {{WikiProject EastEnders|class=}} template to a EE article's talk page so the project can get a better idea of what work still needs to be done. If you believe that an article should be assessed at a certain class assess the article yourself (it's not too difficult to determine the basic classes such as stubs, categories, or lists). Spotlight Update: One EE article has reached GA status in June 2011. Dotty Cotton - Nominated by MayhemMario Member news The recipient of the WikiProject EE Award: was GunGagdinMoan for adding sources to past EastEnders characters. Remember that any editor can give the WikiProject EE Award to another WP:EE member. If you do present this award, please make mention of it here or tell one of the newsletter editors who will then include it in the next issue. Please add your name to the member list if you have not already.	EastEnders Cast Changes June's Departing Cast : Ryan Malloy Julie Perkins Greg Jessop June's Returning Cast: Mandy Salter June's Future Cast: Lola Pearce Andrew From the editors If you've just joined, add your name to the Wik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject EastEnders. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered to your userpage. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 7 – July 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! Newest Articles Dotty Cotton Manda Best Michael Moon (EastEnders) Rainie Cross Kim Fox Jodie Gold Contributors to this issue MayhemMario (Lead Editor, Distributor)
We couldn't do it without you!
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please tell MayhemMario.

Thanks for uploading File:SarahandLydia.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:OriginalClareDevine.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wik.ipedia.Pro is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wik.ipedia.Pro page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Dog in the Pond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:17, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:JasonCunliffe.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your input DBD 23:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tony and Mandy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Finn and Amber.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SteHay.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wik.ipedia.Pro page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RaviRoy.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wik.ipedia.Pro is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wik.ipedia.Pro page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Clare Devine screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wik.ipedia.Pro page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you were the one that created the family trees for each of the Hollyoaks family. Would you be up for making newer versions? Arjoccolenty (talk) 08:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article McQueen family is suitable for inclusion in Wik.ipedia.Pro according to Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Articles for deletion/McQueen family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rain the 1 10:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Riley Costello.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tom Cunningham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Maxsdeath.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wik.ipedia.Pro. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wik.ipedia.Pro's policies and guidelines. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 18:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wik.ipedia.Pro arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:LostHavoc/Template:Hollyoaks characters, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Miscellany for deletion/User:LostHavoc/Template:Hollyoaks characters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:LostHavoc/Template:Hollyoaks characters during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:22, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:LostHavoc/List of characters from Hollyoaks, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wik.ipedia.Pro:Miscellany for deletion/User:LostHavoc/List of characters from Hollyoaks and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:LostHavoc/List of characters from Hollyoaks during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bart McQueen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:MaxandClare.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wik.ipedia.Pro may not meet the criteria required by Wik.ipedia.Pro:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wik.ipedia.Pro:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wik.ipedia.Pro policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Hollyoaks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ashworth family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. The reception is focused on Hannah Ashworth, which already has an article. It is useless to this particular topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 18:26, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LostHavoc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harry Thompson (Hollyoaks), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wik.ipedia.Pro. FireflyBot (talk) 08:21, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]