User talk:MolecularPilot

Welcome to my talk page. You can leave a comment below - thank you for your time in helping me to be a better Wik.ipedia.Pron.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this user asks you to take precautions: 1. Maintain social distancing by starting new posts in new sections, to avoid contaminating other users. 2. Follow the one-way system by putting new posts at the bottom. 3. Sign your comments to facilitate contact tracing.

I got your welcome message, checked out your page, opened up the citation hunt tool, and the very first source was something I could help with! I just started on Wik.ipedia.Pro, inspired to contribute by noticing a lot of lack in WikiSpeedRuns. I appreciate the tip about citation hunt and would love to know of any other tools you've found! NovusPax (talk) 04:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm so glad that you found something to do on Wik.ipedia.Pro! Something else I really enjoy is monitoring the recent changes log to help revert vandalism, and, as soon as you become 'autoconfirmed', you can learn how to do so here. Other thing I like to do is to take a look at this list of uncategorized pages and find categories for them, and a final thing I like is to fix grammar on and add Wikilinks to articles in this list. You can find more odd little things like these at the Task Centre.

Thanks for helping Wik.ipedia.Pro, and if you ever need anything else, please don't hesitate to ask me here! MolecularPilot 22:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why on earth did you have to do that like that was rude — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:A45F:300:DD38:6F30:C1C3:F62 (talk) 01:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You edited in the phrase that are very very very very very very good into the article. This is a subjective opinion, and, as per the Wik.ipedia.Pro policy on having a neutral point of view in articles, I undid your edit as we try to maintain an encyclopedia which is free from personal commentary. If you have any other questions about Wik.ipedia.Pro's policy on the neutral point of view, please don't hesitate to the community Teahouse or myself on this page. MolecularPilot 02:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think 5 sources are too much? two to three sources are fine most of the sources don't have additional info so no need to put more unless a additional info in one source has it. 122.55.235.122 (talk) 06:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I only reverted your edit because you didn't have a summary, I'm actually okay with your rationale that you re-added your edit in with (too many sources).

You'll have to discuss with "SpringProof" who is the user who reverted the edits the second time (with description).

Have a great day! MolecularPilot 06:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already did but he just removed my statement instead of replying. 122.55.235.122 (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I looked through the history and it says the reason was "Rollback Complaining" so I'm not really sure why your comments were removed as there most definitely should be open discussion about rollbacks/reverts and it is not "complaining" to request this! You were also very polite in your comment.

I recommend asking at the Teahouse for some help with this as I'm just a new user so don't really understand the full social dynamics of this website. MolecularPilot 07:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AIV Notice has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Ebrahim Lutfalla. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:17, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to fix small issues immediately after a page is edited. It is very likely the editor will notice them and fix them in the very near future. You can wait some time for the editor to finish. You may ask why the editor would publish their work in progress and not preview their changes. They would publish during the edit to prevent accidental loss of their work. 76.149.22.159 (talk) 08:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thank you for your contributions to Wik.ipedia.Pro and leaving me a message!

I think you were the editor whose changes I copyedited here: [1].

If I see your IP address again, I'll now know that you make edits in parts & I'll wait before copyediting.

For future reference, there's a function called preview intended to check your changes before pressing submit to make sure they are correct - it shouldn't result in any "accidental loss of work".

I also strongly recommend creating an account!

Have a nice day! :) MolecularPilot 08:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]