User talk:Qef

Hi. There seems to be a problem with the image Image:Secant_method_example_code_result.svg that you created. The blue lines should be secant lines, that is, they should go through two points of graph (the red curve). However, they don't. It looks like there is an error in the coefficients that you used to draw these lines. For the moment, I put the old image, Image:Secantmethod_jaredwf.png, back. There you see what the line in the last iteration should look like; it touches the graph at the root. It would be great if you could correct your SVG image, as I think it's very useful to have the secant lines at the earlier iterations. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, those lines have the wrong gradient. I'll try to fix it. --Qef (talk) 16:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, how's that? I think I have the gradients right now (I was calculating x/y instead of y/x). --Qef (talk) 17:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now. Thanks for the image. I put it back in the article. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 17:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geoff!

Regarding User:Qef/Orthographic_hypercube_diagrams, I figured out the solution for the regular polygon perimeter skew orthogonal projections for the hypercubes, see results: File:Hypercube petrie polygons.png. I can tell you how. Maybe you could make a second set of graphs in SVG? The advantage of my graphs over the existing (regular) ones (and your SVG versions) is coloring vertices by overlap frequency. I tested up to 16-cube, edges get overwhelming, although maybe it would be better in SVG with thin/light antialiasing edges.

What do you think? Do you have some time to try some more? (I also want to do the demihypercube family, same as hypercubes, but alternate vertices are deleted) Tom Ruen (talk) 21:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have a request for you: could you please extend the diagrams over 10-cube? It seems that the color of the dots form a circular pattern around the center point of the diagram, it would be educational if the overall pattern (when lim n -> infinity) would be visualized.

While I'm at it, here's another request: Could you also produce a same kind of series for all the platonic solids and beyond?

The stellation diagram of dodecahedron also looks interesting too. I bet the n-dimensional extensions of it are just iterations of this symmetry exhibiting the golden ratio. If so, showing this would too be educational. Probios (talk) 19:38, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Time Runner DVD or VHS cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wik.ipedia.Pro under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wik.ipedia.Pro (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos on makings such a clear and understandable image! Well done, and thanks!

Scraimer (talk) 10:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lovely work. 98.184.160.112 (talk) 19:07, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wik.ipedia.Pro arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qef. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wik.ipedia.Pro arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qef. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wik.ipedia.Pro arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qef. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wik.ipedia.Pro arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qef. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wik.ipedia.Pro arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]