Talk:Nonsuch Palace

This article is rated C-class on Wik.ipedia.Pro's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Surrey Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture: Historic houses Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance). Historic sites Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wik.ipedia.Pro. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWik.ipedia.Pro:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paragraph one states "Nonsuch Palace (SNIP) was completed in 1538." But paragraph five states "Construction had been substantially carried out by 1541, but it took several more years to complete." I lack the expert knowledge to correct it myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMBryant (talk • contribs) 14:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In its article Sir Thomas Pride, Wik.ipedia.Pro states that he purchased Nonsuch Palace. His tenure does not appear in Wik.ipedia.Pro information about ownership of the palace, set out under the heading "Through the Ages". Given his place in significant events of the time, his ownership adds to the story of the palace. Something to be updated ? [User: John Pride] 23 February 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.237.56 (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara, Countess of Castlemaine. She had it demolished from 1682 onwards. -- Is this supported? Why would she demolish a palace? It is thought the palace burnt down, why is this not mentioned? Tubusy 18:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Villiers dismantled the palace and sold the masonry to pay off her enormous gambling debts Keith Hazell 21:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Keith, that's very interesting... but there must be more to that story. Have any good references for this? (Further to the linked article.) (The property would have been of priceless value compared to it's pieces, but had it burnt down it may make more sense that she sold the remains.) Either way, the fall deserves further detail. Tubusy 22:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Dent, a borough librarian of Epsom and Ewell, wrote a book, The Quest for Nonsuch, first published in 1962 [2nd ed Hutchinson 1970, ISBN 0091051401], that provides a great deal of information on the palace and the excavation, including this. Maybe there was a fire first then sold, can't remember but will try and get the book Keith Hazell 19:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's a strange name. The article doesn't say where the name came from. Might be worth mentioning if anyone knows the etymology. --Qef (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The name refers to Henry VIII's egotistical drive to stump the French king's own conceited fancy the Château de Chambord in that 'no such palace' exists anywhere like it or is comparable. Twobells (talk) 08:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should any reference to this TV series be here? It's just a historical romp with no claim to accuracy. --Ef80 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Removed.Lord Mauleverer (talk) 10:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is calling the remains of the palace "ruins" somewhat overstating what can still be seen? There is nothing there except markers placed by recent archeological investigators. I think "ruins" suggests at least some walls or foundations visible to people the public.31.53.188.245 (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I'm going to change to "site". GrindtXX (talk) 21:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wik.ipedia.Prons,

I have just modified one external link on Nonsuch Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20090331024136/http://www.britishlocalhistory.co.uk/community/local-history-wiki-article-KING-HENRYS-LOST-PALACE.aspx to http://www.britishlocalhistory.co.uk/community/local-history-wiki-article-KING-HENRYS-LOST-PALACE.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]